Posted
on Thursday, February 12th, 2009 and is filed under Social Media.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
There’s a theory called Dunbar’s Number that suggests there’s an upper limit to the amount of relationships we can maintain. If you’re interested in networking, this should be an issue. That number, for the record, is 150. Derek Halpern asked me how I dealt with that issue, as I spend my time with far more than 150. Here are some thoughts.
First, an idea from my book with Julien Smith. If people are thinking that Dunbar’s number is all they can manage, then it might become important for you to ensure that you’re part of people’s 150. Meaning, if you’re looking to connect with people, connect with those who are cultivating powerful networks of their own.
You could do this geographically, if that makes sense. If I’m coming to Chicago, I’m counting on Liz Strauss and Amber Naslund (for example) to have the pulse on the ground. If I’m heading to Austin, I’m reaching out to Richard Binhammer or Jason Stoddard or another friend.
Or you might do it by vertical. If I’m thinking about the intersection of the medical world and emerging technology, I’m thinking of Steven Wardell or Andre Blackman or Daniel Palestrant. You get the idea.
Finding the right groups of 150 to connect with is helpful. That way, your 150 is augmented by those other people’s 150s. Make sense?
One way to beat Dunbar’s number is to make it work in reverse. By that, I mean this: if people think of you as part of their 150, then they come to you, and they seek you out. This comes from having some value to offer. If, for instance, you’re helpful in finding others business, those people will seek you out the next time they have an opportunity, or the next time they need your help.
In either case, you’re in the network. You’re a node in their mental systems. Because they’ve got you in mind, it’s easier to let go a bit of your number/memory.
Speaking of memory, why would you ever require your memory to stay inside your head?
You are not required to remember every single person you’ve ever met in your head. Further, you really can’t. The thing is, how will you manage your relationships in a way that you can stay open and personable. One way, I feel, is a database. And when I say that word, don’t faint. Contact management systems count. Your email client counts, depending on how you use it. Here’s what I’m doing.
I’m using BatchBook for my database, because it’s just really simple, and yet powerful. I do this: I take a contact from a business card. In this example, I’ll use DJ Edgerton, CEO of zemoga, a digital creative shop I met with in New York (and thanks to Sven Larsen for setting up a tour to see D.C. Comics!).
I’d put DJ’s typical contact info into my Batchbook contact. Great. Now, I know how to email or call him. Where it gets cool is that I can add tags. Those tags act like ways to slice the database. This means, I can add the following information to DJ’s contact:
So, now, if I want, I can remember DJ not just by his name and when I’m thinking about him, but also when I have a location-specific or work-specific thought in mind.
I have other categories for some folks:
Rest assured that there are several more tags coming as I think of other ways to slice up my database.
Here are more ways to organize your social network.
Comments are closed.